Wine Rules
Most countries
have rules and regulations under which their wines have to be produced, but
those rules are not made because of common sense, or to protect the consumer.
Most naive wine consumers think it was to protect them, but how wrong they are!
Those rules are there to
protect the vested interests of the industry.
Let’s look at some of them.
In
Australia,
the weather is warm and we don’t normally have trouble getting our grapes to
ripen; in fact we sometimes have the opposite problem with grapes being too ripe
and not having enough acid, so In Australia it is
perfectly acceptable,
indeed legal, to add tartaric acid to the wine when it’s being made. If
added in the right amount, the consumer should not be able to notice the
addition and it will help balance the wine. In France, this practice is not just
frowned upon; it’s illegal.
In
France,
they normally don’t have the problem of having their grapes so ripe they need
the addition of tartaric acid, but they sometimes have the reverse problem; they
can’t get their grapes ripe enough and the alcohol level is too low. In France,
it perfectly legal to add sugar
(its called chaptalisation) to the juice
before or during fermentation; the sugar can be in a number of different forms
including cane sugar and various forms of grape must. Surprise, surprise, the
use of chaptalisation in Australia is banned, but then we don’t need it.
In Australia, by
law
certain facts on the label must be true. If a wine is called Shiraz,
it must have 85% Shiraz in it. If it’s from Coonawarra, the same thing applies;
you can’t call a wine a Coonawarra Cabernet if it contains less than 85%
cabernet in it or if half the fruit comes from Clare. (That’s why you see
“Product of South East Australia” on so many bottles; the fruit can come from
anywhere in SA, Vic or NSW.) In general, in Australia we call our wine by the
grape in the bottle.
In France,
there is a completely different set of rules.
None of this 85% rule, but
they do have their own rules. For example, if a red wine has a Bordeaux label,
the rules say it must only contain grapes of specific varieties; Cabernet
Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Merlot, Malbec and Petite Verdot. Theses five
varieties can be blended in any percentage the winery chooses, but they can not
have even 1% Shiraz in the bottle if there is a Bordeaux label on the bottle.
These laws, and
there are similar ones for the other regions, are there to
protect the
integrity and reputation of each region. The laws are tightly controlled and
are there to ensure the industry is protected from radical elements that want to
‘mess with tradition.’
Tradition can
be a good thing, but when it gets in the way of good business, it can be a
problem
as you will now see. For years, the French were the dominant
supplier of wine to the UK (and other major markets) but over time, the
Australians have knocked them off their perch and we now are the number one
supplier of wine in the UK market. The “sunshine in a bottle” and modern
winemaking techniques used in Australia have proved to be popular with
consumers, and our gain has been the French wine industry’s loss at the volume
end of the market. The flavours imparted from oak can also be very attractive
and is another reason that much of the Australian wine has been seen as
attractive.
Oak barrels are
very expensive, especially the French variety but the Australian industry has
used their modern winemaking skill which has enabled them to produce low-cost,
low-end wine with the added attraction of oak characters.
They simply add oak
chips or planks to wine stored in huge stainless steel tanks
and the oak
flavours slowly infuse into the wine; it’s much cheaper than paying thousands
for a barrel.
The use of chips
or wood shavings is very common in the new world but until now, it has
not
been allowed in France. That regulation
is
about to change
which will give the French the ability to use this method, a
practice that was frowned upon in the past.
Economic necessity and a loss of
market share have forced a change in the regulations.
A good example of
vested interests over-riding antiquated regulations to help wineries sell their
products, and make no mistake, that’s what wine industry laws and regulations
are all about. No story could show how true this is more than the next example.
Spain
,
after Portugal, is the world’s second-largest producer of tree-bark corks for
wine. In an astonishingly move, they have banned the use of alternative closures
if wines want to be able to obtain
DO status. The DO status is awarded to quality wine in Spain and is similar
to the French Appellation d'Origine Controlee (AOC) system. No cork, no DO
status!
APCOR
the
Portuguese cork producers’ consortium, called the new Spanish law “yet another
endorsement for the cork closure.” “Spanish lawmakers and wine producers are
responding to what wine drinkers the world over have been telling us for a long
time,” said APCOR’s
Elisa Pedro.
No sane,
rational person could possibly think that this new law is an endorsement of the
quality of cork as a closure
; and anyone who actually believes it needs a
full frontal lobotomy to improve their IQ! It is simply vested business
interests putting pressure on the government to protect their own turf.
It has no more
to do with producing quality wine than the permission granted to the French to
use oak chips; it’s all about protecting market share and looking after their
own industry.